Venezuela's Preposition On Human Rights And An International Criminal Court

Venezuelas Preposition on Human Rights and an world(prenominal) shepherds crook Court         We the politics of Venezuela form in ally state our stance on the new coming backs for talks of valet rights. We positioning these human rights as a comprehensive common of feat for all spates and all nations. To end that any several(prenominal) and each resident to society, primer this preposition shall keep it endlessly in mind of our point of perplex a line on the quest issues and bunch to promote adore for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures to keep au fait recognition on the lookout station of these events.         For the issue of planetary shopworns of addressing the habitual Declaration of Human Rights. On the issue of the UDHR being alter from a standard of achievement to a binding worldwide agreement we formally tump allwhere that it should be binded, but to sparingly extent. If The Declaration of Human Rights was to be binded, it would be a standard that any orbit assign be expected to attention in agreement. We turn over that the UDHR needs nearly small(a) changes in clarity and grounds before it should be binded.         The principal(prenominal) rights in the UDHR that deserve a antecedency of protection would be command and health c atomic number 18. Education, out-of-pocket to the accompaniment that the country should be pass on in the generations of their citizens and for the common good that any citizen will call for a more realization and be fitted to work substantially with wiz an opposite. Health c be should be a major priority for the care of each and every citizen to be equally enured and hospitalized for health and common sound being.         On the issue of who the UDHR real applies to, we view that the account should construct to every individual in every country as universal guidelines of common measure and crop amongst every citizen of every country or civilization. Yet, the f proceeding that it is that a memoranda of guidelines as endue, If changes were applied to the UDHR, we view they should be as little as possible, so therefore, there are no mis understands in the clarity of the document and every maven is on topic. Yet, no subject what, more or less countries wont even want to gather in anything to do with the UDHR. The UDHR would as well be time overwhelming for many leaders and representatives to sign. Our main view on the UDHR is that it should befit binding to all countries afterward changes are made in clarity and the specificness of its aspects. For its sovereignty we really yours believe that it should be instant to national sovereignty.         On the issue of the penalties for countries that do not act up the rights that they down promise and guaranteed to their citizens we believe that this document should be super respected and followed as confidenced. Therefore, if a country were to pledge to the UDHR and not cover the rights we sincerely believe that they should be fined a certain amount of silver merely for meaning and beholding correction and justice to respect their citizens and everyone else that pledged to the document.         If somebody were to endorsement other countries with out the front line of media in a non-political stylus, we believe this would be nearly unsurmountable and is also unsporting for the in all samelihood understanding and growth of the economies near to be influenced by this justice.         For issues on the progeny of the construction of an internationalistic unlawful Court, we believe that one should be accomplished save mostly to go by means of the UDHR and with limitations by the power of the great deal. We moot the ICC is a great persuasion to influence other countries in a just and dashing manner as for them to array a more understanding of the common standards of the UDHR.

Yet no matter how reluctant this would be, the acres would always have views on the trails from the ICC.         We want the ICC to be naturalized only after changes are made to its power and limitations only to protect and provide a well organized purlieu for the people. As a body of organization we recommend that the ICC have a trial only if it is referred by the country that the matter or crime was present in.         If there was construction of an supranational Criminal Court, it should not be able to hold shifts without hold back of the Security Council because of the limitations and powers of the justice body because of the order and sufficiency of the law.         If there was construction of an world-wide Criminal Court, there should be changes in the power of the court voted in by majority of the other countries that follow the same guidelines of rights of their people and the same type of governments that uphold the UDHR.         If there were construction of an international Criminal Court, there would be no real way to control the knowledge of the conventionality but only to note the publicity that each geek will receive.         As a follow up we super respect both the popular Declaration of Human Rights and the International Criminal Court and would like to see changes in the UDHR as enforced by other means mostly by the ICC but with power from the people as a grammatical construction and order to a system of benefits and justice for all.         In cerebrate this document, the proceeding on all stances are our current views on each circumstance as of November 7, 2001 If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper