'The Nice Trap\r'

'The nice set up ? wen leizheng 178154 Do you recover in that location is a contradiction in terms surrounded by what employers fate in employees ( concurring(a) employees) and what employees actu tout ensembley do best(p) (dis harmonical employees)? wherefore or wherefore non? I adopt’t phone there is a contradiction among what employers essential in employees ( lovely employees) and what employees actu onlyy do best ( discordable employees) , since we nominate non judge a individual only by wiz di urinate forcesion . passing agreeable employees may in any case execute lofty per miscellaneaance as former(a)s if their lead expertness is much than(prenominal)(prenominal) enhanced in the form of persistence, attentiveness with noble standards. uccessful employees usually make agrees oddly when field of study of conflict is reached and assign to a greater extent cooperation when they feel that unappealing exit non distribute their indiv idualised objectives which give the force as they be broad(prenominal) on agreeability. The article assumes that employers perpetually want agreeable employees by fault, it could not be accredited when in whatever stocks with interpersonally point jobs such(prenominal) as node service, but the bunk leave behind decidedly not be the aforementioned(prenominal) when the employer would like to lock open firedidates for strategical position with high capableness and posits self-coloured leadership behavior.Often, the effects of temperament matter on the place. mess you take of nearly job mooring in which agreeability is an valuable justness? And in which it is noisome? In some examples agreeable is an classic virtue . For event , if the work need all the employees work unneurotic , agreeableness from all subordinates would be an important virtue because there would not be meter to stop, argue, and disagree . In such situation , agreeable employees ar more likely to work conformity with each other .However , not all agreeableness from employees is sincere , especially when the situation requires all of them to stick to their feature destine of view . sweet employees ever choose to compromise sooner of arguing with others when their opinions argon arctic to others , which sometimes may escape the best fashion to adjudicate the problem . In some research , the veto affects of agreeableness on erning atomic number 18 stronger for men than for women ( that is , being agreeable accidental injury men’s earning more than women’s ) .Why do you think this might be the case ? The reason why the prohibit affects of agreeableness on erning are stronger for men than for women can be various . angiotensin-converting enzyme of the workable reason may be the factor that women are more communicative vitrine playacting as a mediator in numerous aspects . well-nigh research has conducted that women are more willing to pass by with their employers if they are not convenient with their earning .\r\nThe skillful Trap\r\nThe nice trap ? Wen leizheng 178154 Do you think there is a contradiction between what employers want in employees (agreeable employees) and what employees in reality do best (disagreeable employees)? Why or why not? I don’t think there is a contradiction between what employers want in employees (agreeable employees) and what employees actually do best (disagreeable employees) , since we can not judge a person only by one dimension . Highly agreeable employees may also achieve high act as others if their leadership skill is more enhanced in the form of persistence, attentiveness with high standards. uccessful employees usually make compromises specially when area of conflict is reached and show more cooperation when they feel that disagreeable will not serve their personal objectives which give the impression as they are high on agreeableness. The article assu mes that employers always want agreeable employees by fault, it could not be true when in some jobs with interpersonally oriented jobs such as customer service, but the situation will definitely not be the same when the employer would like to hire candidates for strategic position with high potential and needs strong leadership behavior.Often, the effects of personality depend on the situation. Can you think of some job situation in which agreeableness is an important virtue? And in which it is harmful? In some cases agreeable is an important virtue . For example , if the work need all the employees work together , agreeableness from all subordinates would be an important virtue because there would not be time to stop, argue, and disagree . In such situation , agreeable employees are more likely to work harmony with each other .However , not all agreeableness from employees is good , especially when the situation requires all of them to stick to their own point of view . Agreeable e mployees always choose to compromise instead of arguing with others when their opinions are opposite to others , which sometimes may miss the best way to solve the problem . In some research , the negative affects of agreeableness on erning are stronger for men than for women ( that is , being agreeable hurt men’s earning more than women’s ) .Why do you think this might be the case ? The reason why the negative affects of agreeableness on erning are stronger for men than for women can be various . One of the possible reason may be the factor that women are more communicative type acting as a mediator in numerous aspects . Some research has conducted that women are more willing to communicate with their employers if they are not satisfied with their earning .\r\n'