Saturday, January 19, 2019
Whether the Burgess land use model is still relevant in the modern day
Urban come ingestion homunculuss atomic number 18 designed to help us understand how townships develop. Although towns and cities oblige no exact match, the poseurs be designed to show that every urban ara has its similarities. Since models r arly take into account things like hills and rivers, there are no guarantees that the model pass on be completely accurate. I am using the burgess model because it was one of the just about successful come use models- it may well be similarly successful in the juvenile town.A man called E.W Burgess designed an Urban drink down use model, naming it after himself. It was designed in his home expanse of America, in the city of Chicago. This is what he designedBurgess theory was that quite a little competed for contain amounts of space. Only people who that the zones were arranged concentrically, several(predicate) in age and character. Burgess believed that the housing became newer, and the residents became wealthier, the moreo ver they got from the CBD. The people who could leave the best land got it, people like businessmen. The poorest groups were left with the worst locations. Burgess believed that different zones of the city had different functions.These are the sections of the city that he identified* Central business territory contains the major shops and offices, and is the centre for commerce, entertainment and transport.* Wholesale light industry- This is where the oldest housing in the city is. Such housing is usually deteriorating into slum property. Some areas are excessively being taken over by light industry. The locals slant to be immigrants or poorer social groups.* Low mannequin residential- Inhabited by people who bear managed to escape from the previous zone. They work in near factories, and lay down no choice but to live there so they can get to work quickly and cheaply.* Medium class residential- The housing is of a better quality, and is mostly semi detached and council esta tes.* High class residential- Occupied by people who can afford the most costly properties and the high cost of properties, and the high cost of commuting. This zone also includes the commuter train villages beyond the edge of the city, although there were few in Burgess time.The Burgess model is also linked to the bid-rent model. The amount of silver different land users are exiting to pay for the land depends on their location- the CBD has the most expensive rents. It is the most accessible area as most transport services are focused on the city centre, and main roads meet here. The more(prenominal) accessible a location, wherefore the easier it is to get there. Therefore, people prefer to have work locations that people can access easily, and are also nimble to pay more for them.The Burgess Model also ignores the fact that more or less all towns are affected by physical features such as rivers, lakes and hills. It also ignores heavy industries, and housing redevelopment. A lso, in 1924, there was not so much dependence on transport as there is today. early(a) weaknesses in the model include the criticism that in reality, zones do not just end, and the next one begins. Zones overflow, and the model is designed for highly create cities such as Chicago, and not 3rd world cities that you might arrest in Ethiopia and Sudan. Therefore, the model is not universally correct.Hypothesis 1.Land use changes with increasing distance from the centre of Blaydon.This statement fits in with the Burgess model, as Burgess claimed that the land near the CBD will be densely live and tightly fitted, whilst the land further out of town will have more room for things like gardens. Houses will be terraced near the town centre, and semi detatched on the outskirts. This statement fits in with Burgess Bid Rent Model, as he claimed that land in the centre of the town was more expedient and therefore expensive, so less people would be able to afford big gardens.This hypothesis should be honest, because in reality most towns age from the centre, and will therefore have many buildings squashed into a footling section of land near the middle, but towards the countryside there is more forgo spaceHypothesis 2.Housing age will become young with increasing distance from the centre of Blaydon.This theory fits into the burgess model because the further you are from the city centre the junior the houses will be because the harvesting of cities are from the CBD so the houses on the outskirts will be the youngest. The CBD was built premier(prenominal) in the beginning of the development of Blaydon. This means that houses will be built after the early developments. This process will continue until there is no land to build on. This theory means that houses will be younger as you progress further form the CBD.The hypothesis should be confessedly because the Burgess model claims city growth occurred in the CBD first then grew outwards form there.Hypothesis 3T he quality of life-time will improve with increasing distance from the CBD of Blaydon.This theory also fits into the burgess model because as you get further away from the CBD the surroundings qualities should increase and also better housing materials will be available. Hypothesis 2 cerebrate with this hypothesis because as the houses become younger, they will become more modern and better building methods will be being used. Quality of life will increase due to the steady increase of size in houses as you progress further from the CBD. Bigger houses mean more money and better quality of life. For example, big gardens and garages accompanied with driveways. In my view this is a better quality of life compared to terraced houses with no gardens.This hypothesis should be true because the house age will decrease and quality of life will increase as you move further form the CBD. Also the environment wont be as bad because the roads and air will be less congested.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment