Boston Massacre Essay -- essays research papers

The Boston drubbing is considered by many historians to be the rootage battle of the Revolutionary War. The deceasely incident happened on March 5 of 1770. The massacre resulted in the death of five colonists. British troops in the Massachusetts Bay dependency were at that place to stop demonstrations once morest the Townshend Acts and keep order, but instead they provoked outrage. The British s senioriers and citizens brawled in streets and fought in bars. &8220The citizens viewed the British soldiers as potential oppressors, competitors for jobs, and a perform to social mores (Mahin 1). A defiant anti-British fever was lingering among the townspeople.There are three major things that led to the Boston assassinate First was the maturement mistrust among the British soldiers and Americans. There were a number of other incidents were the British clashed with the patriots and their supporters. Individual soldiers were beaten on street corners and soldiers abused unarmed civil ians. In all the Americans in Boston made it clear that the British soldiers were unwanted.The guerilla reason is somewhat odd. The removal of two out of four regiments meant on that point were to inadequate amounts of soldiers to keep the peace. There were enough on the other pass on to remind the patriots of the great British military.The last reason would be the revolution of the Townshend Acts. The patriots and Americans did not agree and strife with the British soldiers over it. The Act strengthened tension between the two. (Griswold 23)On March 5, 1770 the dreadful day came. A mob of people went in front of the Customs Office in Boston Massachusetts and started to throw stuff and give insults at the soldiers. As a result to this so-called harassment the soldiers fired on the crowd. The counterbalance to die was a grim man named Crispus Attucks. He was a inherent of Frainghan, Massachusetts. He escaped from slavery in 1750 and had become a sailor. Crispus Attucks is con sidered the first martyr of the American Independence (Mahin 1). The four others who died were Samuel gray, a rope manufacturer James Caldwell, a sailor Samuel Maverick, a seventeen year old apprentice and Patrick Carr, a leather worker and Irish immigrant. All in which were unarmed and brutally murdered. The soldiers killed three, mortally wounded two others, and wounded six. How untold ha... ...at were stationed in Boston were disgraced for many other crimes. I imagine either the soldiers should possess been guilty for firing without an order or that Preston should have been guilty for giving the order to fire. According to Liesenfelt, the eight men express they were following Preston orders and should be tried at one time (1). So the soldiers are saying they were following orders which means Preston is guilty. Also three black witnesses gave testimony that they did hear an order to fire by Preston. Then again a merchant said he did not hear an order. every way the soldiers and/or Preston should have been guilty. I think it a atomic reactor easier to miss something said than to be hearing things. So the evidence is there that Preston gave an order to fire. I feel the verdict of the trial of the Boston Massacre should have been &8220guilty. The victims were unarmed and brutally murdered. I soldier enraged the citizens and were guilty of many other crimes. The order to fire give from Preston proves he&8217s guilty of the crime of manslaughter. My conclusion is that the soldiers and/or Preston are guilty. &8220Half a pale of blood had been spilled into he snow (Mahin 2).