Dali :: Essays Papers

DaliSpanish panther. Born into a middle-class family, he study at the Academy of Fine Arts in Madrid, where he master academic techniques. Dal also pursued his personal inte stay in Cubism and Futurism and was expelled from the academy for indiscipline in 1923. He formed friendships with Lorca and Buuel, read Freud with fervor and held his first one-man show in Barcelona (1925), where he exhibited a numeral of seascapes. He wrote the screenplay for Buuels Un Chien Andalou (produced in 1928), largely thanks to which he was adopted by the Surrealists. In Paris he met Picasso and Breton, and his involvement from 1929 onwards, his effervescent activity, his flair for get publicity through scandal and his vivacity which counterbalanced the political difficulties encountered by the group, do him a particularly welcome addition.Over the next few eld Dal devoted himself with passionate intensity to developing his method, which he depict as paranoiac-critical, a spontaneous method of irrational knowledge based on the critical and systematic objectivation of delirious associations and interpretations. It enabled him to demonstrate his personal obsessions and fantasies by find and meticulously fashioning hidden forms within pre-existing ones, either promiscuously selected (postcards, beach scenes, photographic enlargements) or of an accepted artistic canon (canvases by Millet, for example). It was at this period that he was producing works like The Lugubrious granulose (1929), The Persistence of Memory (1931) and Surrealist Objects, Gauges of Instantaneous Memory (1932). Flaccid shapes, anamorphoses and double-sided figures producing a trompe-lil effect combine in these works to create an extraordinary world where the erotic and the scatological jostle with a fascination for decay - a universe that is reflected in his other works of this period, including his symbolic objects and poems (La Femme visible, 1930 LAmour et la mmoire, 1931) as well as the screenpla y for LAge dOr (1930).It soon became apparent, however, that there was an inherent contradiction in Dals approach between what he himself described as critical paranoia - which lent itself to systematic interpretation - and the element of automatism upon which his method depended. Breton soon had misgivings closely Dals monsters which only lend themselves to a limited, univocal reading. Dals constitutional statements on political matters, in particular his fascination for Hitler, struck a false note in the context of the Surrealist ethic and his relations with the rest of the group became increasingly strained after 1934. The break finally came when the painter declared his support for Franco in 1939.