Ban on Assault Weapons

In todays society the topic of ravishment weapons conduct been truly controversial. From mass shootings to defending oneself, this is a topic that seat be very difficult to agree on. In this paper I impart be discussing if the national political relation should throw away self-loading weapons. In my opinion, assault weapons should non be banned. With this decision, I consider the implications of the endorsement amendment, common safety, and the fact that weapons exit never cease to exist. With these reasons I will apologise to show that the federal government should not ban automatic weapons.One of the reasons I stand behind not allowing the federal government to ban automatic weapons because under the constitution, the Second Amendment states A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the citizenry to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed (Mount, Steve, 1995). Although this bed be interpreted differently to other mass , this amendment allows sight of the linked States to have an individual right to keep and bear arms. The mass be allowed to be armed, if wanted.I believe it is an important part to consider when banning weapons because this is a part of our rights, and should not be taken away. The Bill of Rights was designed to ascertain individual rights and independences. Once you take away a right that is in the constitution, in that location is no limit on the endless amount of things the government can then take away, including free speech, freedom of religion, and voting rights. So, not following this amendment for the sake of banning weapons does not only risk losing this freedom but also the other rights we as Americans should have.With not taking the second amendment into consideration and banning weapons anyways, people feel that human race safety will increase. The opposing side would take this as one of their main reasons to ban weapons. I believe that public safety would not c hange. Crime will not go down by banning weapons since the majority of criminals have unregistered weapons. If we ban guns, criminals still will get a require of them, unless we ban them worldwide, make gun making illegal, and destroy every wiz gun ever.Some of the strictest gun controlled states in the US have the highest crime rates, because ordinary people have less protection. Guns dont kill people, people choose to kill others. I believe that if people be fitted to have guns, they be able to protect themselves when in danger when on that point is no government, or police to protect them at that moment. People are less likely to attack or commit a robbery if they know that a victim is armed, or able to fight back. Citizens can not only protect themselves, but will feel at peace knowing they are able to defend themselves when a home calls for it.Public safety is important, and if the government cannot protect its citizens, then it is their obligated rights to do so thems elves. Making a law banning assault weapons is something that is ideal for people who want to stop violent acts, or crimes that come from weapon use. But, there are unceasingly pros and cons to situations. Weapons will never cease to exist because if it is not an assault weapon it will be something else. Weapons have and will always evolve. Getting rid of weapons from the public will be a very difficult task.In conclusion, the federal government should not ban assault weapons. proscription assault weapons will not make them disappear. In order people to protect themselves, their property, and their own families it is a legitimate right of the citizens to own weapons. As citizens we have the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. These rights were made for the people and should not be interfered with. Public safety should not only be contingent upon assault weapon use but the actual public itself.Weapons will never cease to exist because today, the majority of cases involving firearms used are not legally bought or even registered, but are calamitous or stolen. There has not been much progression at the federal level regardless of nationwide news coverage on the new-fangled mass killings, and not a lot of detail of what will eliminate in the future of a law that will ban weapons. In my opinion weapons should not be banned, because in reality this nation is not a harmless environment, and to be defenseless in a indispensable time is not a good situation.