Haircut by Ring Lardner Essay

In his short story, Haircut, Ring Lardner employs an atypical establish of debate style. Although the story is told completely from the point of view of a barber, what makes it unique is that the reviewer is a part of the story as the barbers customer. Lardner makes go for of the stereotype that barbers are real talkative while they do their work, and single can learn all the town gossip from them.The barber himself is very talkative by nature, inferred from when he says that he does not mind shave corpses, except that he gets kind of lonesome with them because he cannot talk to them. He also seems unaware of his gossiping nature because, once, he actually lolly himself by saying that he shouldnt ought to be gossipin even though he had been gossiping the entire time. This barber goes on with his stories with no stimulation needed from the customer/reader, and so seems to skip from one topic to another, similar to the pattern of idle chatter.This random jumping of topics is ac tually essential to the story. Lardner builds his characters using little background stories that expose their personalities. This style involves so many characters and so many stories that a straightforward third-person story would not have been close as effective. One other importance of the barbers point of view is that he makes no judgments as he tells his stories. He talks about Jim Kendall, who he has a good ole boy type of affinity with.From the stories, the reader can tell that Jim, the recently deceased funny barbershop patron, was in fact a rather bad man. Jim did not give his married woman enough money to live on and cheated on her repeatedly, knowingly skint his childrens hearts, made fun of a mentally ill person, and roughly assaulted a woman. Even knowing all these things, the barber still insists that Jim was a good fella at heart. Lardner uses the idle chatter of a loving barber to tell the story of what was, most probably, a murder of a very unpleasant man.