Recording technology in music

Recording technology in medication There engage been prominent advances in music technology this has led to the do of technology in music being far greater and wider spread. There has been a dramatic impact on musicianship. The music written text process is defined as the act of composing, rehearsing the moment and physically making the record, through to doing final change and mastering to perfect the arranging.The first music recording was do by Emile Berliner in 1884, this was recorded on a tin foil surface cylinder,but since and then recording technology has vastly ameliorate and editing techniques nonplus became easier and more advanced. Through the transition from recording on wax cylinder, additive immortalize, compact dish and digital cutload. These developments have had m whatsoever effects, both optimistic and oppose. There has been a lot of debate related to these developments.One of the chief(prenominal) beas in which recording technology has mod ify musicianship is that advances in recording technology, consequently the music that the end attender hears is hardy ever what the musician primarily played, as recording and editing technology advances, this is becoming more apparent, and edited songs are drifting further a charge from what the musician had performed. This idea has created a lot of controversy with the listener, as they are unsure of what the artist is receptive of, and what parts of the music have been manufactured artificially during the editing stage. realisticly passel argue that these advances are an advantage as it means that the music that they listen to is of a higher role, and has a higher musical verity and is free of performance errors, this is due to advances in technologies such as rake correction, which allows for sections in the performance that are go forth of tune to be corrected, it as well as allows for new sections of a song to be written by adjusting the put up of a single none, to give samples of a range of otherwise notes that heap then be arranged to construct new melodies for the piece. In a similar faction sections of music can now be speeded up, slowed d deliver and moved through time in order to allow a artists performance to be corrected if he or she falls out of time during in that location performance. Both of these techniques are product of improved recording technology, and a lot of listeners appreciate that music is of a higher quality and more enjoy equal to(p) to listen to.In the contrary in that location is a group of people that think these benefits in technology are a disadvantage, due to the fact that the final edited version of a piece of music that the listener hears is often extremely different to the original recording that the musician actually performed. It is besides criticized that how anyone can become a obliterate star due to the increased use of technology, which means that you dont have to have any musical bangledge o r talent as any errors that are made can now be corrected. These opinions are reflected by Neko Case who saysIm not a perfect note hitter both but Im not going to cover it up with auto tune. Everybody uses it, too. I once asked a studio guy in Toronto, How many people dont use auto tune? and he said, You and Nelly Furtado are the only two people whove never used it in here.This shows that despite people uniform Nekos protest against the use of these editing techniques they are used in roughly every piece of music nevertheless. These technologies have also disposed(p) way to new genres of computer establish music. Developments in recording technology, recording pitiable on to computer based systems has also largely effected musicianship, as now that most recording systems are computer based a lot of editing techniques are far simpler, and no edit or process is final, as all processes can be undone with the instancy of a button, where as in more conventional tape based recordi ng systems undoing processes required a lot of manual work, or may even be unachievable. An advantage of this development is that music producers are able to experiment with different edits and processes, in order to find an final result that they are satisfied with, if they try any processes that they are not clever with the piece can easily be reverted to its former state. When traditional tape recording methods where used editing involved cutting the tape up, then sticking it back together again, this means that it requires far more achievement than using a modern computer systems. When using a traditional tape system undoing edits is far more difficult, so producers may be discouraged from experimenting with edits as it would require more work. In the other hand the same factors have disadvantages, such as the fact that producers may pose edits on a traditional system that do not laboured quite right, but it may be impossible or ineffective to rectify this, these miserab le flaws would add character to the piece, which would not follow when using a modern computer systems, as any small imperfections can easily be removed without any bother. These facts or so how recording and editing require far less skill is explained by David Wiliams and cock WebsterWhen computers where large and delicate and required trained system operators, and when the first pass devices relied on complicated procedures to connect one element to another, you needed to know a great deal about technical things. This has all changed. This has given way to home recording which has enabled a lot more musicians to be able to produce there own pieces and become well cognize as home recording equipment is readily available. As recording technology has essential sound quality of recordings has improved dramatically. The initial recordings that where made on wax cylinders had a lot of hiss and crackling in the recording, a low signal to noise ratio, this made the music in the recor ding very hard to make out and the recording unpleasant to listen to, where as in modern recordings these noises have almost been eliminated. An example of this improvement in sound qualities is shown in this news article regarding new mike technology new high-performance MEMS microphones enable dramatic advancements in sound quality.This has made listening to music far more pleasant. Which has improved musicianship as it has made it easier for musicians to listen to others performances and use them as inspirations for there own pieces. This has also allowed backing tracks to be produced to help musicians learn pieces which they can use to make there performances sound more realistic when they are playing solely or in small groups. As recording technology has developed and new distribution mediums have became available, music has became more portable, more wide available, and in general a higher quality. This has improved musicianship, as it has made it easier for musicians to lis ten to others performances, and use them to motivate and inspire themselves. In general this has improved musicianship but it has also had more or less detrimental effects such as sound quality being anomic, particularly when music became digital in 1982 with the release of the compact discthat would replace the vinyl record. Many people argued that the use of digital data to represent audio led to a intemperate loss of quality in the music, as some of the sound is lost due to compression and digital sampling, which can give digital recordings a dull tone compared to the brighter tone or analogue recordings, one somebody that says this is Wayne Ellis Lee who says that vinyl has a warmer, fuller sound while CD has a digital, mechanical sound.In the contrary a digital compact disc recording can be played an infinite number of multiplication without a loss in quality, but with an analogue recording some of the quality is lost, and you get a noticeable hiss if it is played repeatedly . new(a) mp3 technology and internet downloading of music also has both positive and negative effects on musicianship. An negative effect is that due to internet downloading and accomplice to peer networks, it has became a lot easier for individuals to obtain free copies of an artists music illegally, this is grow by Mark Katz who says While there is nothing illegal about MP3 and P2P technology per se, it is illegal to download or distribute digital files of copyright recordings with-out the permission of the copyright holder.These illegal downloads mean that the artist is not get the royalties for there song that they deserve, and may be discouraged from producing there own music because it is not financially feasible for them.When music was distributed on a physical medium it was more difficult for listeners to obtain illegal copies of a recording. Consumers where also encouraged to purchase an artists product due to the fact that they where obtaining a physical copy of the son g. Where with modern music downloading the listener gets a virtual file containing the music performance, the fact that the music is not in a physical form is also an advantage, as musicians and listeners are now able to have much larger music collections. The music retailers can cite a wider selection as they are not limited by the physical space needed to store the music. In conclusion there have been many advances in recording technology that have affected musicianship, most of these developments have made in easier for musicians to record, market and improve there performances, but these developments have also produced many disadvantages for both the musician and the listener.