Global Setting Essay Example for Free

Global Setting EssayWith the rapid expansion of globalization coupled with an surprise digital revolution, the civilization has taken a quantum leap to land in an era w present the innovation seems to be a global village. Consequently, this new era demands a matching code of conduct from mankind, of which the format would be new but the content would be based on ancient determine. This is because, the modern lifestyle is secure of al bingle kind of communications 24/7, ranging from home, office, family, business associate, society, etc. Human activities switch risen to a great height these days, thanks to the state-of-the art communication systems, which expanded and fastened the entire communication process, all the while wiping away physical boundaries of regions and creating a cross- ethnic platform for the civilization. All of the above clearly shew how much important it is to be culturally competent in the modern world to make the to the highest degree of the advanc ement of science and technology.However, at the core of cultural competency remains the ancient array of value, which acts wish well the steering wheel of human mind and thus the set of values commands primary attention, which contains the elements the like personalized values, governingal values, cultural values and goodity. This essay explores the nuances of the above elements before analyzing how an individual can reconcile them in a global ground. Background Even as the personal, organizational and cultural values and moral philosophy unfathomed somewhat similar, each of them is unique in its let way.For example, Ethics is the study of the choices plurality make regarding obligation and wrong (Paul Elder, 2003, p. 11). Accordingly, it is open to individual variation, since determination of right and wrong or close and bad is subjective. This is where the humans drive some set principles that would guide them especially in the modern global setting, where people from different cultures work together. It is here the organizational values and ethics differ from the personal ethics which adopts its feature set of values and ethics that would suit their multicultural workplace environment.Accordingly the researchers opine, Organizations argon often considered monoliths that have their avouch persona, values and ethics (Kruckeberg, 1998, p. 47). However, the universally accepted premise of ethics like doing uttermost honorable for maximum people watchs its place though again thither whitethorn be different interpretation of that construct due to different cultural connotations for example if a vegetarian considers eating non-vegetarian food as un good, then that would be personal interpretation or choice of the person, besides being a subject of private practice. directly the global setting might bring in the said person with said set of values in such a workplace where most people like non-vegetarian dishes, thereby presenting anothe r interpretation of personal value. However in both the cases the central idea would remain common that food is our generator of sustenance. It is because of such situations amid global setting, the researchers stress on maintaining ethical guidelines in the workplace or in a multicultural society.Accordingly the companies adopt ethical models to establish their ethical culture that would dictate its ethical norms and the employee manner (Trevino, 1986 Hunt and Vitell, 1986). According to Paul Elder (2002, p. 13), this helps individuals to less(prenominal)en their attention to the importance of individual judgment in ethical decision-making and instead, concentrate on the organizational ethics. Another important aspect of such models is that they help the members of the organizations to bar the role-conflict arising out of the residuals between organizational ethical culture and personal ethical philosophies.Personal Ethical view Personal ethical perspective depends on the de gree of ethical awareness in a person, where s/he might base it either on what it is good to be or what it is good to do, towards attaining object lesson excellence. However, there are more dimensions to it, since there are various theories that explain the issue in their own way. For example, utilitarian construct can influence a person to see ethics from any of the cardinal angles like Pleasure concept of Jeremy Benthan, Happiness concept of John Stuart Mill, Ideals concept of G. E. Moore, or Preference concept of Kenneth Arrow (Utilitarianism, 2008).However, all of the above dimensions carry the basic insight of utilitarianism, which suggests that the purpose of morality is to make the world a better place and therefore, humans should work towards that direction (Ethics, 2006). organizational Code of Ethics Organizational code of ethics is a set of standards, rules, guidelines, and values that govern and guide ethical business fashion in a company, profession, or organization of its employees, interactions among the employees, and interactions between the employees and the general public (12MANAGE, 2009).Thus it is distinctly different from the personal code of ethics in the sense that it evolves from the organizational culture as Trevino would put it, ethical culture is a subset of organizational culture, representing a multidimensional interplay among various formal and informal systems of behavior overcome that are capable of promoting ethical or unethical behavior (Trevino et al. , 1995, p. 12). Thus here the values are imposed and the employees have the responsibility to align them with their own set of values.However, it is always expected that the code of ethics maintained in a company would never miss the central theme of ethics, i. e. , maximum good for maximum number of people. Mechanism of Personal Ethical Philosophies An understanding on the mechanism of individual difference in personal ethical philosophies is very important towards recon ciling the values. The above can be enclose by two factors like idealism and relativism, says Forsyth (1980), where he underpins idealism as the indicator of the magnitude of an individuals fearfulness regarding an action, and how the consequence of that action affects the welfare of others.For example, a low howling(a) individual might endorse insidious action with the belief that such action would bring greater good, while a high idealistic individual would always believe the opposite and pass on only those actions that would lead to positive consequences. (Forsyth, 1980 Forsyth, 1992). Forsyth (1980) takes relativism as the indicator of the magnitude of an individuals concern regarding accepting or rejecting the universal moral principles.For example, high relativistic individuals would be open to admit that there are more than one ways to perceive the concept of ethics and moral actions, since ethics are dependent on the nature of the situation. On the other hand, low relati vistic people would believe in moral absolutes, and would base their ethical decision making process on fixed principles (Forsyth, 1992). The above understanding generates the idea that towards reconciling all values, the individuals need to nurse the facts like there are many ways to perceive ethics as different situations influence human perception.However, here comes the issue of role conflict, or the fear of losing ones own personal set of values and ethics, since the theories on ethics suggest that organizational code of conduct or norms of ethics affect the personal ethical philosophies of its members, and at last re-shape their ethical judgment and behavior (Hunt and Vitell, 1986 Baucus and Near 1991). While role conflict emerges when humans find themselves inharmonious to the requests, policies and expectations of others (Rizzo et al., 1970), it is here Forsyths (1980) concept comes in handy, as one can exploit it to find what type of people would go for what for example , a high-relativistic individual whitethorn excuse an unethical decision if that serves their self-interest since they are the ones who accommodate multiple concept of ethics and believe that ethical actions depend on the specific situations (Barnett et al. , 1996). This shows that high-relativists are less likely to suffer from role conflict due to their adaptive attitude regarding ethics.On the other hand, high-idealists, who privilege to operate on fixed principles of ethics, stand to suffer from role conflict, since the values that their organizations prescribe to maintain may go beyond their fixed set of values (Schermerhorn et al. , 2002, p. 63). Cultural Values Cultural values may influence the making of an idealist or relativist of different magnitudes, yet it has its limitation, since it is mostly confined by geographic boundaries.Therefore, multiculturalism can always extend ones perception of values much in the mold of Chinese delicacies that have become a common featur e across the globe. There is another reason no one is actually forced to remain within the boundaries of ones own culture and thus, the positive sides of other cultures have generous potential to convert even the high-idealists to high-relativists The above state of affairs clearly shows that reconciliation of personal, organizational, and cultural values and ethics depends on several factors like below 1.Ones own personal state of belief 2. Ones own understanding of the concept of ethics 3. The intensity of it in the persons decision-making process 4. The nature of the value-set prescribed by the organization 5. Proximity and involvement to the primary culture 6. Appropriate training of cultural comepetency. Conclusion While managing cultural values does not seem to be a daunting task (one can easily maintain a good chunk of them in private), the issue of managing personal and organizational values amid global setting may be difficult if people dont prepare them accordingly.And, going by the theorists, this journey seems to start from high-idealist vizor to high-relativists, and thus, it can also be assumed that there is always the possibility to misjudge the situation or to be driven by the philosophy of convenience. Therefore, the individuals themselves should set their line of control on the scale of high-idealist to high-relativist. A balance in them is always desirable to get the maximum out of the current global setting. For that matter, members of organizations need to learn and practice decision-making in real-life situations.There are several cultural competency training modules available, like Kwongs Model (Kwong, 2008) or Griggs Model (2005) that work towards developing the cultural sensitivity and awareness among the subjects. Apart from that, good knowledge on applicable ethics theories, such as Dialogic Theory (Buber, 1955) can come in handy, because it helps to underpin the state of communication and to act accordingly. Therefore, in todays multicultural global setting, humans require to mountain cautiously on the multidimensional sphere of ethics to achieve happiness, peace and prosperity.References12MANAGE. (2009). Web document. Retrieved June 21, 2009, from http//www.12manage.com/description_code_of_ethics.htmlBarnett, T., Bass, K., Brown, G.. (1996). Religiosity, personal moral philosophy, and intentions to report a peers wrong doing. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1161- 1174.Baucus, M. S., Near, LP. (1991). Can illegal corporate behavior be predicated? An event history analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (1) 9-36.Buber, M. (1955). Dialogue. In Between Man and Man. Boston, MA beacon fire Press.Ethics Matters. (2006). Web archive. Retrieved June 21, 2009, from http//ethics.sandiego.edu/theories/Utilitarianism/